It is my
sad duty to inform you that "Killer Joe" does not mark filmmaker
William Friedkin's return to his former glory.
2006's underrated "Bug" notwithstanding, Friedkin hasn't
done much worth our attention since "The French Connection" and
"The Exorcist."
The director has floundered in mediocrity since the '70s, even
making some flat-out bad films like "Jade" and "Rules of
Engagement."
"Killer Joe"
focuses on the Smith family. When Chris
gets himself in trouble with more debt than he can handle, the Smiths decide to
hire a hit man to kill his mother so they can split her insurance money.
Enter the title
character, a menacing cop who kills people on the side.
The problem is the
Smiths can't pay Joe up front, so they work out a deal. Joe gets full use of Dottie, the baby of the
family, as a kind of retainer.
Inevitably, things go
terribly wrong, but we don't really seem to care about the troubles heaped onto
the Smiths. Each of them is so detestable
they frankly deserve to have Joe in their lives.
The family's misfortunes are more than
warranted.
I’m by no means someone
who needs likable characters to enjoy a film, but try as it might, “Killer Joe”
is no “Blue Velvet.”
There is one scene
involving a piece of chicken and a battered Gina Gershon that brings to mind
Dennis Hopper’s “MOMMY!” scene in “Blue Velvet.” But Joe is no Frank Booth.
Frank was nightmarish and
creepy, where Joe is unsettling at best.
Actually, the film's
most menacing moments don't feature Joe at all, but Chris's debtor, Digger,
played by character actor Marc Macaulay.
He only has one scene, but Macaulay delivers the film's best
performance. Frankly, I wanted to see
more of Digger.
There are some
melodramatic moments in the film, but not enough to sustain the thriller
throughout.
The bottom line is, while "Killer
Joe" is bold and at times tense, but it just isn't very good.